Less is More: A Quick Teaching Lesson
75Check out my new book:
In my new book, "Accessible American History," I apply in written form the simple lesson described in this article: breaking down American history to the essentials and showing how it applies to life in the United States today. The link below will take you to a hub that provides more details, including links to where it can be purchased.
Breaking Things Down to the Essentials
One of the most valuable things that I learned when I was getting a teaching credential many years ago was the concept “less is more.” Eighteen years of teaching have further strengthened my faith in this key concept. The idea is as simple as it sounds. When students are expected to learn a large amount of information in a short time, they may become overwhelmed and end up learning very little. On the contrary, if a teacher breaks things down to a few essential ideas and covers these concepts thoroughly, students will have a better chance of retaining the information. Less material covered can lead to more material actually learned.
This concept is particularly important in a history course. One of the reasons many people dislike history is because they view it as a mass memorization exercise in which they are expected to absorb various facts about famous events and (mostly dead) people. It is apparently nothing but a training course for either completing future crossword puzzles or impressing your friends while watching Jeopardy. So if a college history professor dumps a one-hundred-question multiple-choice test on his or her students – filled with obscure, very specific dates and names - it will reinforce students’ frustrations with this subject. Memorization, of course, is an inevitable and essential part of any type of learning, and history teachers should expect students to memorize certain key facts. The trick is separating the key facts from the trivia.
So here is a simple example of how “less is more” can work. World War II may be the most studied and discussed topic in American history. One can easily spend a lifetime studying nothing but this subject. I have met several people over the years, in fact, who could tell you practically everything about World War II and very little about anything else. (The History Channel used to be nicknamed the World War II channel.) We don’t have a lifetime, however, in a community college American history survey course; in fact, we only have three or four hours to spend on World War II. So how do you narrow down the mass of material that could be talked about into just a few hours?
For every topic I cover, I try to break things down to a few key questions. My Power Point outline is then built around these simple questions. For World War II, the core questions are similar to those for every major war I cover, from the American Revolution to Vietnam. First, who was fighting and why? We then do a quick overview of the motives behind German and Japanese expansion. Second, how did the United States respond when World War II started, and what circumstances eventually led it to enter the war? We then talk about the reasons why the United States initially stayed out of the war and the process by which it gradually became involved, culminating in Japan’s attack at Pearl Harbor. Third, who won this war and why? We then talk about the advantages that the allies had in the war, focusing primarily on their ability to produce more than the Germans and Japanese. Next, we discuss the impact that the war had on people living in the United States, discussing its impact on the economy, federal government power, and social change. Finally, we finish this topic by discussing issues that the United States had to deal with when the war ended, with the most important being the threat posed by our former ally: the Soviet Union.
So there you have it: World War II broken down into a single paragraph. And if you think that is impressive, you should see what I do during test reviews. Typically, during the class before a test, I go over everything that will be on the test in about ten minutes. Obviously, this is not done in tremendous detail, which is kind of the point. I want students to get the big picture straight in their minds before they worry about memorizing some of the details. They need to see that history is a story, and if you break it down to certain key questions, it is much easier to make some sense out of that story. On most of the tests that I give, half of the points are determined by two essay questions. After conducting our review, I encourage them to predict what these questions will be. All they have to do is look at the essential questions that we have covered for each topic. They are right there in the class notes. They just need to take the main headings in the Power Point outlines and turn them into questions.
Now I could give other, more detailed examples to explain the concept of “less is more,” but I think that I will stop at this point. Less, after all, is more.
vote upvote downshareprintflag
- Useful (1)
- Funny (1)
- Awesome (2)
- Beautiful (1)
- Interesting (3)
CommentsLoading...
Makes sense. When I was in college back in the 1950's the intent,to some extent, was to eliminate some number of students. besides grading on the curve, trick questions were often put into tests.I don't know how many of us lost points on a question that where the answer was the author of the text book.
I personally try to have a theme or two that I focus upon during each lecture. These themes tie into the theme of greater emphasis on individual rights in British/American history. Many students seem to think that the founding fathers were terribly innovative in all of their thinking. I'm trying to get them to see that much of the thinking goes back to Europe, so my US survey to the Civil War has been spending quite a bit of time in Europe.
Apparently you want to teach rather than just pass students through the mill. That's a dangerous and revolutionary idea that probably doesn't sit well with some of your peers.
I wish there were more like you.
Freeway Flyer-I wish I had a history teacher like you when I was in school. I'm one of those you mentioned who hated history b/c of the memorization of dates that made no sense to me. I love your way of teaching and it must be very successful. I'll check out your newly published book and congratulations to you!
I was very lucky when I was young. My parents bought an encylopedia. I devoured the volume called "Great lives".
Familiarisation with the characters that made history did the trick. I have been hooked ever since.













Eliminate Cancer Level 4 Commenter 3 months ago
I wish every teacher could see this!!